Gladych v. New Family Homes, Inc
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.
This case concerns the proper interpretation of MCL 600.5856, which sets forth the requirements for tolling the statute of limitations. We hold that the unambiguous language of MCL 600.5805 and MCL 600.5856 provides that the mere filing of a complaint is insufficient to toll the statute of limitations. In order to toll the limitations period, one must also comply with the requirements of § 5856. In so holding, we overrule the erroneous interpretation of § 5856 in Buscaino v Rhodes, 385 Mich 474; 189 NW2d 202 (1971), overruled in part on other grounds by McDougall v Schanz, 461 Mich 15; 597…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. CornellMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Ostroth v. Warren Regency, GP, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- W a Foote Memorial Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims PlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.