Legal Opinion
Coyne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 11, 2008PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Both Margaret Coyne (Claimant) and Villanova University (Employer) petition for review from an Order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for the reasons stated below.
Claimant worked for Employer as a reference librarian. On March 23, 1999, she was attempting to fix a paper jam. She fell off the stool she was standing on and her right foot became entangled in the same. Claimant missed approximately two weeks of work following her injury but returned thereafter at modified duty with no loss of earnings.
A…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Waldameer Park, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Potere v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Petsinger v. Department of Labor & Industry, Office of Vocational RehabilitationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Washington v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.