Legal Opinion

McCorquodale v. Keyton

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 31, 1953PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

63 So.2d 906 (1953)

McCORQUODALE et al.

v.

KEYTON et al.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

March 31, 1953.

F.S. Browne, Panama City, for M.E. McCorquodale and Mary Emma McCorquodale.

Liddon, Isler & Welch, Panama City, for J.M. Webb.

J.M. & H.P. Sapp, Panama City, for appellees.

DREW, Justice.

The title to fractional NE 1/4 of Section 9, Township 3 South Range 17 West, was acquired by M.E. McCorquodale in 1927, The south boundary of this property is the Gulf of Mexico.

In 1935 McCorquodale and wife platted the land. On the plat there appeared the following dedication, duly acknowledged:

"State of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. WorleySupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  3. Lennig v. Ocean City Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
  4. Boothby v. Gulf Properties of AlabamaSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  5. Cornwell v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Canell v. Arcola Housing Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. United States v. A. Harvey GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  4. Wise v. QuinaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Wahrendorff v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API