Legal Opinion
City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 21, 1920PublishedCited by 50 opinions
A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. Pierre Branning, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
The declaration filed herein is as follows:
“City of Miami, a corporation, by Hudson, Wolfe & Cason and Price & Eyles, its attorneys, sues Florida East Coast Railway Company, a corporation, in an action of ejectment, because the defendant is in possession of a certain tract or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in Dade County, Florida, described as follows, to-wdt:
“Beginning at a point in the corporate limits of the City of Miami, Florida, where the center line of Third Street, if extended Easterly across the Boulevard in the City of Miami would intersect the East boundary line *542of said…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Thiesen v. Gulf, Florida & Alabama Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- City of Demopolis v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- City of Chicago v. DrexelIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- McCorquodale v. KeytonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- City of Palmetto v. KatschSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- United States v. A. Harvey GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- City of Winter Haven v. State Ex Rel. LandisSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- City of Miami Beach v. Miami Beach Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.