Legal Opinion
Canell v. Arcola Housing Corp.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 23, 1953PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
65 So.2d 849 (1953)
CANELL et al.
v.
ARCOLA HOUSING CORP. et al.
Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.
June 23, 1953.
Martin Yelen, Miami, and Jay Burton Keys, Miami Beach, for appellants.
Charles F. Wells, Miami, for appellees.
SEBRING, Justice.
The appeal in this case involves the sufficiency of an amended complaint filed by the appellants as plaintiffs below, against the appellees, as defendants below, to recover money damages for the alleged fraud and deceit of the defendants.
The amended complaint, which was dismissed by the court below, on motion of the defendants, contained, in substance, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yates v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Dung v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Burdine v. SewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- McCorquodale v. KeytonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Winthrop v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Florida College of Osteopathic Medicine, Inc. v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. PickardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Eclipse Medical, Inc. v. American Hydro-Surgical Instruments, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
- Mildfelt v. LairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Collins v. McCombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.