Legal Opinion

Snyderwine v. McGrath

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1941No. Appeal, 168PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

In this action of replevin the defendant has a money judgment entered after verdict by a jury, and plaintiff has appealed assigning as error the refusal of her motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial.

The appellant is the widow and administratrix of one Joseph Snyderwine and the chattels in dispute were on a farm owned by them as tenants by entireties. The Snyderwines did not live on the farm; it was occupied and farmed by defendant under some salary arrangement not clearly disclosed in the record. Snyderwine committed suicide November 24, 1936. Later,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Yeager's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Leadenham's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Suravitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alex N. Bell v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Brightbill v. BoeshoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Petro v. Secary EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Martella EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Tomayko v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API