Petro v. Secary Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Bell,
Plaintiff brought an action of assumpsit against the Administratrix of the Estate of the defendant who died December 23, 1958. Plaintiff died after trial but pending this appeal and is now represented by his Administratrix. Plaintiff sought to recover on an express oral contract (a) the difference between the wages he was paid as assistant mine foreman and later as mine foreman and the usual wage of an assistant mine foreman and a mine foreman for the same period of time and (b) 10% of the profits. The alleged oral contract was entered into between plaintiff and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gerfin v. Colonial Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Mooney's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Leadenham's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- King EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Stafford v. Reed, Admr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- DiFlorido v. DiFloridoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- In Re Estate of IndykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Donsavage EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Girsh TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Kadilak WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.