Legal Opinion

Alex N. Bell v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 7, 1960No. 13000PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

This diversity action brought by an insured (Bell) against his insurance company (Commercial) is the aftermath of a lawsuit arising out of an automobile accident in which Bell' was the defendant and the injured parties obtained judgment against him in the amount of $24,000. Bell was defended by Commercial pursuant to its obligation under the insurance contract, which contained the usual provision requiring it to defend and reserving to it the right to make such investigation, negotiation and settlement as it deemed expedient. Bell, however, was short not only in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Snyderwine v. McGrathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Tapler v. FreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Casseday v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Marion J. Brown and Allen Brown v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. State Auto. Ins. Co. of Columbus, Ohio v. RowlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1968

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API