Legal Opinion
Brace v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 1, 2000No. 98-897 LPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*274ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Senior Judge.
A property owner filed a complaint alleging that the government effectively took his property without just compensation when plaintiff was ordered to cease maintenance and operation of a drainage system on its property and to restore portions of property to a prior condition which would exhibit wetland characteristics. Plaintiff contends that the government action has interfered with his reasonable, investment-backed expectations he had when he acquired the property in 1975, since jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act had not been extended until 1977.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Walcek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Lost Tree Village Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.