Legal Opinion
Wadsworth v. Zahariades
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 8, 1983No. (2002)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, J.
The plaintiffs and the defendant own adjoining land. The defendant appeals from a judgment granting the plaintiffs an easement by prescription over a portion of the defendant’s land and permanently enjoining the defendant and subsequent holders of title from erecting a fence on that portion of the defendant’s land consisting of a strip of land five feet wide and seventy-five feet in length.
The defendant claims error (1) in permitting the plaintiffs to amend their complaint 2 and their prayer for relief; 3 (2) in granting the prescriptive easement in the manner and form found by the court when…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Presutti v. PresuttiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Reynolds v. SofferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Kaiko v. DolingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Francis v. HollauerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Francis v. HollauerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Luciani v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- McCullough v. Waterfront Park Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Gallo-Mure v. TomchikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.