Legal Opinion
Kaiko v. Dolinger
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 30, 1981PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
The parties hereto are adjoining owners of residential property on Prospect Avenue in Hartford. Between the two properties lies a paved driveway approximately half of which is located on each lot. The plaintiff brought an action to quiet title to her land in which she sought an injunction restraining the defendant from using any portion of the driveway on her land. The defendant filed a counterclaim in which he claimed an easement by prescription over the plaintiff’s portion of the driveway. The trial court found for the defendant both on the complaint and on the counterclaim and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wadsworth Realty Co. v. SundbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Hawley v. McCabeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Sachs v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Putnam, Coffin & Burr, Inc. v. HalpernSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Labbe v. Pension CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Robert S. Weiss & Co. v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.