Legal Opinion

Cotton v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1989No. 8810SC1055PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error in setting an unreasonable attorneys’ fee award. In an action under Chapter 75 of the General Statutes alleging unfair or deceptive trade practices, the prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees when the court finds (i) that the party charged with a violation wilfully engaged in unlawful conduct proscribed by the Chapter and (ii) that there was an unwarranted refusal by the party charged to fully resolve the matter. G.S. 75-16.1.

One purpose for the statute authorizing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Winston Realty Co., Inc. v. GHG, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Morris v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. City Finance Co. of Goldsboro, Inc. v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ge Betz, Inc. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Garlock v. HensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Shepard v. Bonita Vista Properties, LPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Nobles v. First Carolina Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API