Burwell v. Wilkerson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Respondent appellants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motions to set aside and vacate the 9 May 1975 orders of confirmation. We find no merit to this assignment of error.
As Justice Copeland, speaking for our Supreme Court, recently stated in Sink v. Easter, 288 N.C. 183, 198, 217 S.E. 2d 532 (1975), “ ... & motion for relief under Rule 60(b) is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and appellate review is limited to determining whether the Court abused its discretion.” Here, a careful and critical review of the trial court’s order denying…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by11 opinions
- City Finance Co. of Goldsboro, Inc. v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Kavanau Real Estate Trust v. DebnamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Hoglen v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Harrington v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Endsley v. Wolfe Camera Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.