Legal Opinion
United States v. Washington
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 20, 1946No. Cr. No. 21021PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 F.Supp. 143 (1946)
UNITED STATES
v.
WASHINGTON et al.
Cr. No. 21021.
District Court, D. Maryland.
December 20, 1946.
Bernard J. Flynn, U. S. Atty., and James B. Murphy, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.
Ward B. Coe, Jr., of Baltimore, Md., for defendant.
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The question in this criminal case is whether there was sufficient independent evidence of the corpus delicti to corroborate the extra judicial confessions of the defendants. The defendants are jointly charged under 18 U.S.C.A. § 408, with the transportation from Oxford, Pennsylvania, to Waterloo,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- McNamara v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Forte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Daeche v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Felkner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- State v. BestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Debinski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- United States v. Danny ShunkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.