Legal Opinion

Felkner v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 24, 1958No. [No. 52, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 75 opinions

(Four Appeals in One Record)

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

In the appeals of Felkner and Bafford from judgments and sentences that followed verdicts of guilty on the first count of a burglary indictment, we must reverse because there was not sufficient evidence that the breaking was with an intent to commit a felony. Felkner also was found guilty generally on two indictments charging forgery, uttering and false pretenses of and by the use of checks taken from the burglarized building. There was evidence to sustain those verdicts.

The building of the Daily Motor Express, Inc. was burglarized between closing time on the evening of November 21, 1957, and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  3. Glickman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Debinski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  5. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Brewer v. MeleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. People v. MarquesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. Butz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API