United States v. Danny Shunk
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
On March 15,1988, following a jury trial, the district court entered a judgment of conviction against the defendant, Danny Shunk, for his violation of the terms of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The defendant appeals from the judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
From…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Gillam KerleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Wallace HooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Richard LangleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Marvin Edward MainsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Lonnie Ray WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BartelhoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.