Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1934No. 24479PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The single and important question presented by this demurrer is whether the administrator of the estate of a deceased dependent may recover the compensation to which the dependent was entitled while living.

It is the contention of the respondent that Article II, Section 35, of the Constitution of Ohio, Section 1465-61, General Code, Section 1465-68, General Code, Section 1465-68a, General Code, Section 1465-68b, General Code, Section 1465-72, General Code, and Section 1465-83, General Code, make no provision for the payment of compensation to anyone except "workmen and their dependents."…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bozzelli v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Whitmore v. Indus. CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnston v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Breidenbach v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Nossal v. Terex Division of I.B.H.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Estate of Orecny v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Estate of McKenney v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API