Legal Opinion

Breidenbach v. Mayfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1988No. 87-775PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The cardinal question presented in this action is whether the legal representative of the estate of a workers’ compensation claimant may appeal a decision of the Industrial Commission to a common pleas court pursuant to R.C. 4123.519. We hold in the negative and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

This issue was originally raised by the appellants in the court of appeals upon their filing of a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. “Where a court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of an action or an appeal, a challenge to jurisdiction on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fox v. Eaton Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Jenkins v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Seeley v. Expert, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Pulley v. MalekOhio Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnston v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of Columbus v. SpingolaOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. McKenney v. Hillside Dairy Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Nossal v. Terex Division of I.B.H.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rhynehardt v. Sears Logistics ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API