State ex rel. Nossal v. Terex Division of I.B.H.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
It is undisputed that Lawrence Nossal’s death was industrial and that his widow Ann was his lone dependent. As a result, her application for death benefits was granted. Unfortunately, she died before the commission disbursed the funds,.prompting the current dispute. David, her estate’s administrator, seeks payment of death benefits from the date of Lawrence’s death to the date of Ann’s. The commission responds that Breidenbach v. Mayfield (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 138, 524 N.E.2d 502, forbids payment. The commission accurately summarizes Breidenbach. Today’s analysis, however, persuades us to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Whitmore v. Indus. CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Breidenbach v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Johnston v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Estate of McKenney v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Nossal v. Terex Div. of I.B.H.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. White v. Internatl. House of PancakesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.