Estate of Hastings
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
On January 18, 1943, Harry C. Hastings employed A. J. Treat as his attorney to represent him in relation to a trust that had been set up by his grandfather and which was then the subject of litigation in an action pending in the superior court in San Francisco. Treat associated appellant Samter as cocounsel in the matter, with the approval and ratification of Hastings, on a contingent basis, counsel to receive 40 per cent of any recovery effected from the trust. The sum of $73,827.23 was then on deposit in escrow in a bank to await the judicial determination of the conflicting claims of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of De BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Estate of McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Tomsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Baxter v. BillingsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- McManus v. NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aviles v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & ScrippsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Estate of KerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Estate of StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Petrulis v. WilksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006