Legal Opinion

Tomsky v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1901No. S.F. No. 1206PublishedCited by 16 opinions

CERTIORARI from the Supreme Court to annul orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco adjudging the petitioner guilty of contempt. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Application of a writ of certiorari to review certain orders of said court, Department Nine thereof, adjudging petitioner guilty of contempt.

The petitioner was the attorney of one Dora Levy, the executrix of the will of Michael L. Levy, deceased, whose estate was being administered in said court, and also of said Dora Levy, as guardian of the estate of one Marcus Levy, a minor, which was also pending in said court. The said Dora Levy paid to petitioner the sum of eighty dollars as a retainer and for costs in the estate, and the sum of thirty dollars as a retainer and for costs in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re PaschalSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Ex parte HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ex parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Estate of De BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Vazzano v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Schecter v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ex parte Le HardySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API