Legal Opinion

Petrulis v. Wilks

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 2006No. B182444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, J.

Under the Probate Code, an attorney for the administrator of an estate may be paid for extraordinary services under a “contingency fee” agreement if the trial court approves the agreement after a noticed hearing. (Prob. Code, § 10811, subd. (c).) The trial court may dispense with notice for “good cause.” {Id., § 1220, subd. (c).)

In this case, the trial court approved an agreement entitling counsel to attorney fees based on hourly rates and the total number of hours worked. The trial court dispensed with notice of the hearing and sealed a portion of the record so that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Estate of GilkisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Estate of TryninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API