Legal Opinion

Mills v. Richmond Company, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 1, 1923No. Civ. No. 4688PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

This is an action for rescission of a contract for the purchase of two lots in the city of Richmond, Contra Costa County. The grounds of rescission are defendant’s breach of its covenant to perform street work. The case was before this court on a previous appeal (56 Cal. App. 774 [206 Pac. 486]), wherein it was held that the complaint pleaded a cause of action and the order of the trial court sustaining a demurrer thereto was reversed. On the trial of the case the parties stipulated to the material facts in controversy, but offered some evidence showing that the actual cost of the street work…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. Harbor Business Blocks Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Mills v. the Richmond Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kohn v. KohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Calabrese v. Rexall Drug & Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Smallpage v. Turlock Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Milton Meyer & Co. v. CurroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Frankish v. Federal Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API