Legal Opinion
Secrist v. Diedrich
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 20, 1967No. 2 CA-CIV 339PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
Appellants, members of the School Board of Tuscon School District No. 1, appeal from a declaratory judgment in which the appellants were held to be violating statutory law (A.R.S. § 34-201) in performing landscaping work at new school buildings without advertising for competitive bids.
It was admitted by the appellant school board that, in connection with the construction of each of three new schools, it had performed site improvements at a cost in excess of $2500. This work was contemplated at the time of the letting of the school construction contract but was not included…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ethington v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Podol v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. CohenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
- Maricopa County v. LepplaArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. City of TombstoneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Quimby v. School District No. 21 of Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Tucson Community Development & Design Center, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Dail v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.