Legal Opinion

Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. City of Tombstone

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 12, 1965No. 2 CA-CIV 35PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This appeal presents for our consideration the validity of a sale of municipally-owned utilities. Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Coop., Inc., and Sid Wilson, a taxpayer, filed an action in Cochise County against the City of Tombstone, its Mayor and Councilmen. The plaintiffs sought to enjoin the defendants from selling and conveying the City’s gas and electric utilities- and also sought a decree setting aside as-illegal and void the election to sell the utilities. Arizona Public Service Company, the-successful bidder on the purchase of the utilities, appeared as intervenor.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Glendale v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Phoenix v. Landrum & Mills Realty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Fish v. Valley Nat. Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. The Gamewell Company, a Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Prescott Courier, Inc. v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. R & D AMUSEMENT CORP. v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Liberty Lake Sewer District No. 1 v. Liberty Lake Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Secrist v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. City of TombstoneArizona Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API