Legal Opinion

Dail v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 16, 1980No. 1 CA-CIV 4731PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Roland Dail, initiated an action in superior court requesting that a contract between appellees City of Phoenix (hereinafter, City) and Presley of Arizona (hereinafter, Presley) be declared “illegal, void and without authority of law.” He further prayed that the Mayor and Council members, Manager, and Director of Water and Sewers of the City of Phoenix be enjoined from operating the water system that was the subject of the contract. The trial court granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that appellant did not possess the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Western New York Water Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Ethington v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gruber v. Lincoln Hospital DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Santa Rosa Lighting Co. v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Henderson v. McCormickArizona Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tucson Community Development & Design Center, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. John E. Shaffer Enterprises v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Klein v. RonstadtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API