Legal Opinion
Entertainment & Amusements of Ohio, Inc. v. Barnes
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard D. Simons, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff to strike certain portions of the defendant’s answer and counterclaim under CPLR 3211 (subd. [b]).
It appears that, by the terms of an agreement entered into June 1, 1962, the plaintiff agreed to sell to the interpleaded defendant, WQSR, Inc., various business assets. The defendant, as a member of the law firm of Melvin & Melvin, represented the plaintiff as its attorney and performed various legal services in connection with the sale and other unrelated legal matters. Subsequently, on October 22, 1962, it was agreed between the plaintiff and WQSR, Inc. in a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowling Green Savings Bank v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- City of New York v. Avenue U Service Center, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
- Henry v. FowlerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1870
- Casolaro v. BlauNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Falk v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Proskauer Rose Goetz & MendelsohnNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. J.H.W. & Gitlitz Deli & Bar, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Doran v. Treiling (In Re Treiling)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Janson v. Cozen and O'ConnorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Marsano v. State Bank of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.