Casolaro v. Blau
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.
This is an examination before trial by plaintiffs of the defendant, as an adverse party. Defendant has refused to answer certain questions and refused to furnish certain factual information admittedly in his possession relating to claims hereinafter referred to, upon his asserted ground that the same are not pertinent to said examination. This court is asked to pass and rule upon the propriety thereof.
It appears that plaintiffs sold certain films (photoplays) to one Parisi, an attorney at law, for $18,000, and that the bulk of said purchase price, $13,700, was deposited with the defendant, an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Public National Bank v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Herbage v. . City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Brand v. ButtsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Middleton v. BoardmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Proskauer Rose Goetz & MendelsohnNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Entertainment & Amusements of Ohio, Inc. v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. JonesNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1958