Falk v. Goodman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Eilperin, J.
Plaintiffs seek the return of payment made on a contract of sale of real property, and accordingly move for summary judgment.
The papers reveal that plaintiffs entered into a contract of sale for the purchase of a home owned by the sellers. The contract provided that the plaintiffs may elect to apply for a conventional mortgage in the sum of $15,125 at the prevailing rate of interest and in the event of inability to obtain such mortgage on or- before June 13, 1958, and on five days ’ written notice to the sellers, all money paid on the contract was to be refunded and returned to the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Lion Brewery v. LoughranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Entertainment & Amusements of Ohio, Inc. v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Falk v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Surgil v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970