Legal Opinion

Janson v. Cozen and O'Connor

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In these cross-appeals we are called upon to determine whether a valid escrow agreement can arise when a lawyer acting solely upon the instructions of his client deposits the proceeds from the sale of opposing party’s stock into his law firm’s escrow account, then, after subsequently informing opposing party that the proceeds from the sale of her stock has been placed in his law firm’s escrow account, utilize a portion of these same funds at his client’s instruction to settle another case. We hold that a valid escrow agreement between the law firm’s client, opposing party, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Blackman v. Federal Realty Investment TrustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Paul v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Angelcyk v. AngelcykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tenos v. State Farm InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. LEM 2Q, LLC v. Guaranty National Title Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Santarelli v. National Book Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1999
  4. Atlantic States Insurance v. King, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County2006
  5. Kreig v. Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API