Legal Opinion
Corona v. Esposito
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 16, 1966No. File No. CV 3-6410-3590PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.
The plaintiff sued to recover damages claimed to have resulted from the purchase of a secondhand 1959 Ford Calaxie automobile, which purchase, it is alleged, was induced by the fraudulent misrepresentations of the defendants to the effect that the car was in good condition and had been rebuilt and completely reconditioned. Believing such representations to be true, the plaintiff claims he bought the car, paying the defendant Esposito $1143.45. The plaintiff further alleged that the statements were false and known by Esposito or his agent Elbaum, the eodefendant, to have been false when they…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Ursini v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Sallies v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Ford v. H. W. Dubiskie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wagner v. Dan Unfug Motors, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- First Charter National Bank v. RossConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Chamberlain v. Bob Matick Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- Connecticut Junior Republic v. DohertyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985