Legal Opinion

Connecticut Junior Republic v. Doherty

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 28, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Eight charities complain that a lawyer’s error in drafting a codicil cost them $1,305,060 in bequests. A judge of the Superior Court, who heard the case without a jury, determined that, to the extent the lawyer erred, the testator consciously ratified the mistake, thus relieving the draftsman of liability. We affirm.

Here are the background facts. Richards Haskell Emerson executed a will on May 19, 1960, which provided for residuary legacies to seven charities (original charities). 3 At that time Emerson was domiciled in Lakeville, Connecticut, to which he had retired after many years of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Page v. FrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Stowe v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Ursini v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Salois v. Dime Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. Hull v. Attleboro Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Goren v. Royal Investments Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  4. New Bedford Institution for Savings v. GildroyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. DiVittorio v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A. Ex Rel. Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust (In Re DiVittorio)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API