Legal Opinion

State v. Ripka

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1992No. CM90-0765, CM90-0204 CA A67701 (Control), CA A67702PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for theft in the first degree by receiving, ORS 164.015(5); ORS 164.095, or, alternatively, review of his sentence. We affirm.

Defendant was charged with theft of property with a value greater than $500 after being found in possession of a mountain bicycle that had been stolen from a Corvallis sporting goods store. He claimed that he had bought it for $80 from a woman whom he did not know and that he believed the bicycle was worth about $200. The state tried the case on two theories: theft by taking or theft by receiving. His first trial ended in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. TremillionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API