State v. Ripka
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for theft in the first degree by receiving, ORS 164.015(5); ORS 164.095, or, alternatively, review of his sentence. We affirm.
Defendant was charged with theft of property with a value greater than $500 after being found in possession of a mountain bicycle that had been stolen from a Corvallis sporting goods store. He claimed that he had bought it for $80 from a woman whom he did not know and that he believed the bicycle was worth about $200. The state tried the case on two theories: theft by taking or theft by receiving. His first trial ended in a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. TremillionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.