Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 1973No. C-72-09-2777 CrPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant was convicted of second-degree theft (ORS 164.045) in the district court of Multnomah County. He appealed to the circuit court where he was convicted of the same offense after a jury trial. On appeal, defendant makes three assignments of error: (1) the complaint was deficient because in charging theft without specifying the method by which the theft was carried out, it failed to inform the defendant of the nature of the crime alleged; (2) the state should have been required to elect upon which theory of theft it intended to proceed so that defendant could adequately prepare his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. RedemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. State v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. State v. AschenbrennerOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Oregon v. GulbrandsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BurrowOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Core v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. KorelisOregon Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API