United States v. Jordan
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*165Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Judge:
Despite a plea of guilty and a sentence less than that adjudged at.trial and provided in a pretrial agreement with the convening authority, the accused contends that his conviction for larceny and two specifications of robbery, in violation of Articles 121 and 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 922, respectively, should be reversed because he was deprived of “his right to be represented by civilian counsel provided at his own expense.”
At an Article 39 (a) session held before convening of the court, the accused appeared before the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. VanderpoolUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. KinardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. ChilcoteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. GoodsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. BellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HarnessNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
- United States v. WiestCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. WiestCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004