Legal Opinion
United States v. Radford
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided December 20, 1982No. 39,506; ACM S24841PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*323Opinion
FLETCHER, Judge:
Review was granted in this case1 in order for this Court to consider the following questions:
I
WHETHER THE ACTIONS OF THE MILITARY JUDGE DENIED THE ACCUSED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.
II
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE INSTRUCTED THE COURT MEMBERS THAT THE DEFENSE HAD MADE A “SUDDEN INTRODUCTION OF THE DEFENSE OF ALIBI.”2
Further review of the record indicates that some amplification of these questions is necessary. Accordingly, the issues for review are modified as listed below and will be discussed seriatim:
A. Was it proper for defense counsel to expose…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Joseph CalabroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Ben Lee Brown v. Walter E. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. James Earl Young, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. RivasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. ElzyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. RobertsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. KingU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. FuentesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.