Maricopa County v. Barfield
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Recently, our supreme court held that Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 33-934 (2000) authorizes a health care provider to enforce its lien “only against those liable to an injured person.” Blankenbaker v. Jonovich, 205 Ariz. 383, 71 P.3d 910 at ¶ 1 (2003). The court additionally determined that § 33-934 identifies the only parties subject to lien enforcement actions. Id. at ¶ 17. In this appeal, we decide whether a tortfeasor’s insurer is one “liable to an injured person,” thereby permitting a health care provider to enforce its lien against that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- West Nebraska General Hospital v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Blankenbaker v. JonovichArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Walter v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Andrews v. Samaritan Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pargman v. VickersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Abbott v. Banner Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Midtown Medical Group, Inc. v. Farmers Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Aguilera v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Anderson v. Everest National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.