Legal Opinion
Pargman v. Vickers
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 31, 2004No. 1 CA-CV 03-0561PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, J.
¶ 1 This appeal arises out of a personal injury case filed within the two-year statute of limitations by plaintiff-appellant Brenda Pargman against Betty Vickers. When Pargman sued Vickers, she did not know Vickers had died.
¶ 2 After expiration of the limitation period, Pargman filed an amended complaint naming Vickers’ estate and sought to recover against the only assets of the estate, insurance proceeds available under a policy issued to Vickers by the real party in interest, Foundation Reserve Insurance Company. The trial court dismissed Pargman’s amended complaint,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Julius Korn v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Brooks v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Gailor v. AlsabiKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Hamilton v. BlackmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Costello v. CaslerNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El DestinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Currier v. SutherlandColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Nelson v. SchnautzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Duncan v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Ex Rel. Estate of PopCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.