Legal Opinion
Aguilera v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 22, 2006No. 05-15899Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Enoc C. Aguilera and Emma F. Aguilera appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their diversity action alleging breach of contract, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud under Arizona law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim, Brunette v. Humane Soc. of Ventura County, 294 F.3d 1205, 1209 (9th Cir.2002), and we review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to alter or amend the judgment, Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brunette v. Humane Society Of Ventura CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Haisch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Culinary And Service Employees Union, Afl-Cio Local 555 v. Hawaii Employee Benefit Administration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Ring v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Ferguson v. Cash, Sullivan & Cross Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.