Reeves v. McHan
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Under the rulings in Fender v. Drost, 62 Ga. App. 346 (7 S. E. 2d, 800), Harwell v. Blue’s Truck Line Inc., 187 Ga. 78 (199 S. E. 739), and Sprayberry v. Snow, 190 Ga. 723 (10 S. E. 2d, 179), we think that the petition stated a cause of action against McHan. The defendant cites the case of Buchanan v. Ellis, 39 Ga. App. 840 (149 S. E. 100), as holding otherwise. That case was distinguished in Fender v. Drost, supra, for the reasons therein stated. The cases of Fraser v. Hunter, 42 Ga. App. 329 (156 S. E. 268), and State Highway Department v. Stephens, 46 Ga. App. 359 (167 S. E. 788) are also…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Wall v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Donaldson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Sprayberry v. SnowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Fraser v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Har-Pen Truck Lines, Inc. v. Frederick Allen Mills, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Crockett v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Perry v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Dishinger v. Suburban Coach Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Liberty Loan Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.