Legal Opinion

Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1903PublishedCited by 53 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Roberts. Pulaski superior court. February 6, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

On January 21,1898, the Dannenberg Company presented to the judge of the superior court of Pulaski county a petition in which it was alleged, that at different times during the year 1897 the plaintiff had sold.to George D. Mashburn & Company, a mercantile partnership, doing business in Hawkinsville, Georgia, and composed of George D. Mashburn and J. • P. Doster, certain articles of merchandise on credit; that the credit thus extended was based solely upon certain written statements as to their assets and liabilities, made by Mashburn & Company to a named association of merchants of which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Holmes v. Langston & WoodsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Waldrop v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Newman v. Claflin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Finley v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Wall v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Haas & Howell v. GodbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Register v. Stone's Independent Oil Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API