Donaldson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
The sections of the Code referred to in the foregoing questions were all taken from the act of the General Assembly approved August 21, 1906, commonly known as the pure-food and drug act. Ga. L. 1906, p. 83. It appears from the caption and other portions of this act that it had the purpose, among others, of preventing adulteration, misbranding, and imitation of foods sold and intended for human consumption, under penalties for its violation. Section 4 contained several subsections, defining adulteration. This section is now contained in the Code, § 42-109. So far as material in…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Platt v. Southern Photo Material Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Kelley v. John R. Daily Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
- A. O. Andersen & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- People v. SnowbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Williams v. GrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Orthopedic Equipment Co., Incorporated v. Dennis EutslerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Pedigo v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Norris v. Pig'n Whistle Sandwich Shop Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Bennett Drug Stores Inc. v. MoselyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.