Legal Opinion
Dishinger v. Suburban Coach Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 13, 1951No. 33511PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.
(After stating the facts.) Two special grounds of the demurrer attacked the allegations of the petition as amended and the specifications of negligence (a) and (b) as to the bus not being marked “school bus” and having no marking whatsoever thereon to indicate to persons approaching the bus that it was being used to transport school children, it being contended by the demurrants that such marking was not required as it was not a school bus in the sense contemplated by the Code, § 68-311, upon which the plaintiff relies. That section is a codification of section 2 of the act of 1933 (Ga. L.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Mississippi City Lines, Inc. v. BullockMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
- Shannon v. Central-Gaither Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Cartwright v. GravesTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Gazaway v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Har-Pen Truck Lines, Inc. v. Frederick Allen Mills, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Ussery v. KochCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Farley v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. TuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Davidson v. HorneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.