Legal Opinion
United States v. Joe Canada
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1997No. 96-30319, 96-30320PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Per curiam
Joe Canada appeals his sentence for convictions under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(4)(B), and 2423(b). Finding no error, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The convictions that underlie the sentence that is the subject of this appeal relate to Canada’s computer solicitation of a person whom Canada thought to be a thirteen-year-old male minor, and Canada’s resulting travel across state lines with intent to engage in sexual acts with the minor. On March 10, 1995, Canada was indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in a three-count indictment. Count one charged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. Robert Gerard HornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Florita Bell Griffin, Terrence Bernard Roberts, Joe Lee WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Paul Frederick LaneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Cox v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Marvin HershCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.