Legal Opinion

Cox v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2001No. 99-11029PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs Harold Cox et al. filed suit against Defendant City of Dallas, Texas and Defendant Jeffrey A. Saitas, Executive Director of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, alleging violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. The City appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Plaintiffs injunctive relief under § 6972(a)(1)(B). Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s judgment denying injunctive relief against Saitas. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case involves…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Bruce Goldfarb v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Severstal Sparrows Point, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  3. Cordiano v. Metacon Gun Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Kent A. Sommer and Andrea Sommer v. G. William Davis and Charles G. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API