People v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
The question presented in this case is whether Kent County’s former system of selecting jurors denied defendant his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury drawn from a fair cross section of *203the community. To establish a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requirement, a defendant must show that a distinctive group was underrepresented in his venire or jury pool, and that the under-representation was the result of systematic exclusion of the group from the jury selection process. Duren v Missouri, 439 US 357, 364; 99 S Ct 664; 58 L Ed 2d 579 (1979). We hold that defendant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Alfred J. Rioux, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Gary W. JackmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- People v. HubbardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State of Iowa v. Kelvin Plain Sr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Berghuis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- People v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. GlassMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.