Berghuis v. Smith
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg
The Sixth Amendment secures to criminal defendants the right to be tried by an impartial jury drawn from sources reflecting a fair cross section of the community. See Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U. S. 522 (1975). The question presented in this case is whether that right was accorded to respondent Diapolis Smith, an African-American convicted of second-degree murder by an all-white jury in Kent County, Michigan, in 1993. At the time of Smith’s trial, African-Americans constituted 7.28% of Kent County’s jury-eligible population, and 6% of the pool from which potential jurors were drawn.
In Duren v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Alfred J. Rioux, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- State v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Prost v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- State of Iowa v. Kelvin Plain Sr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. Carl HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2013
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.