Legal Opinion
United States v. Gary W. Jackman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 17, 1995No. 133, Docket 93-1868PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JON 0. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:
This appeal concerns a procedure adopted by clerical staff in the District Court for the District of Connecticut to remedy a jury selection process that had inadvertently, but systematically, excluded from petit jury veni-res all residents of Hartford and New Britain, communities with large minority populations. The adequacy of this procedure, no longer in use, is challenged by Gary W. Jackman on his appeal of judgment of the District Court (Alfred V. Covello, Jr., Judge), convicting him of bank robbery, in violation *1242of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).1 Because the procedure…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Richard Albert JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Alfred J. Rioux, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Luis Manuel Rodriguez-LaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.