Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.
In 1951, the defendant ordered seventy-five barrels of curing salt for resale by it to meat packers. It specified that the salt should be manufactured for it by the plaintiff and contain eighty-five per cent sodium chloride, twelve per cent sodium nitrate, and three per cent sodium nitrite. The plaintiff filled the order, packed it in fiber drums, and delivered it f. a. s. (free alongside ship) in New York. It was shipped to Seattle via the Panama Canal and arrived in Seattle in December, 1951.
The defendant’s customers began returning orders filled by it because the salt was caked “like…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lord v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
3Cited by46 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Eastlake Community Council v. Roanoke Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Wise v. FardenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Stringfellow v. StringfellowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.