Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1964No. 7174PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a directed verdict in favor of the defendant in a motor vehicle accident case.

Harold Peterson and his wife Viola sued the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District for damages arising from a collision occurring at the intersection of Twenty-second Street and Lincoln Street in Maricopa County. An *3automobile being operated by Harold Peterson collided with the end of a power pole being towed by a semi-truck and pole trailer owned by the defendant Power District and being driven by Harry Marshall.

The evidence, which was largely…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Alires v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bryan v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Barango v. E. L. Hedstrom Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  5. Downs v. Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Bailey v. Jeffries-Eaves, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Wilks Et Vir v. ManobiancoArizona Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API